Salud Mental ISSN: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. México - PDF

Description
Salud Mental ISSN: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz México Lara Muñoz, María del Carmen; Medina Mora, Ma. Elena; Borges, Guilherme; Zambrano, Joaquín

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 9
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information
Category:

News & Politics

Publish on:

Views: 16 | Pages: 9

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Share
Transcript
Salud Mental ISSN: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz México Lara Muñoz, María del Carmen; Medina Mora, Ma. Elena; Borges, Guilherme; Zambrano, Joaquín Social cost of mental disorders: Disability and work days lost. Results from the Mexican survey of psychiatric epidemiology Salud Mental, vol. 30, núm. 5, septiembre - octubre, 2007, pp Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz Distrito Federal, México Available in: How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SOCIAL COST OF MENTAL DISORDERS: DISABILITY AND WORK DAYS LOST. RESULTS FROM THE MEXICAN SURVEY OF PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY María del Carmen Lara Muñoz*, Ma. Elena Medina-Mora**, Guilherme Borges***, JoaquÍn Zambrano**** SUMMARY Introduction When the impact of illness is evaluated by indicators like mortality, mental illness has a less significant impact than other illnesses. As a result, the impact of mental disorders was underestimated until the last two decades of the previous century. This perception began to change as a result of two factors: On the one hand, the study of the Global Burden of Disease reported by Murray and Lopez, and, on the other hand, the definition of mental disorders by the American Psychiatric Association. The common element shared by these two factors is the inclusion of the concept of disability. Disability is the deterioration of the expected functioning of a subject of a particular age and sex in a social context. It is a part of the social cost of illness. Objective To assess the disability burden associated with depression, mania, agoraphobia, social phobia, general anxiety, panic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) according to the Mexican Psychiatric Survey and to compare results with the disability produced by some chronic non-psychiatric conditions. Method This survey is based on a stratified, multistage area, probabilistic sample of adults living in urban areas of Mexico. The instrument used was the third version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. We report the 12-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders as defined by DSM-IV criteria. We also evaluated non-psychiatric chronic conditions like diabetes, arthritis, hypertension, backache, and other painful illnesses, identified in general as chronic conditions. Indicators of disability were Sheehan s scale and number of work days lost. This is an easy and fast self reporting scale, which can be used both in the clinic or research. The sub-scales can be added or averaged to obtain a total score. The scale of responses is a horizontal line with numerals from 0 to 10 and five verbal descriptions, with the description Not at all corresponding to a value of 0; Mild rangimg from 1 to 3; Moderate from 4 to 6; Severe from 7 to 9; and Very severe corresponding to 10. Results Close relationships and social life were the areas most deeply affected. The disorders found to produce the highest levels of disability were depression, social phobia, and PTSD. The lowest disability levels were observed in chronic conditions. On the total score of Sheehan s scale, disorders with the highest level of disability were PTSD (mean 5.35 ± 0.307) and depression (mean 4.72 ± 0.167). Depression and panic attacks were the disorders by which most days were lost on average in the previous year (25.51, CI 95 : ; 20, CI 95 : ). Days lost were lower in chronic conditions than in the seven mental disorders studied (6.89, CI 95 : ). Discussion This is the first paper to demonstrate the impact of mental disorders in Latin America evaluating the association of disability with common mental disorders. We have shown that mental disorders, especially depression, are associated with deficits in functioning and result in the loss of work days. We have also shown that persons with common mental disorders have, on average, higher levels of disability than those observed among persons with a wide range of chronic physical conditions. These results are consistent with prior studies in North America and Europe that have found that persons with common mental disorders experience substantial disability in social role functioning. Key words: Social cost, disability, lost days, depression, mental disorders. RESUMEN Introducción Hasta las últimas dos décadas del siglo pasado se subestimaba el impacto de los trastornos mentales. Semejante percepción cambió debido a dos factores: por un lado, el estudio de la carga global de la enfermedad y, por otro, la definición de los trastornos mentales según la Asociación Psiquiátrica Americana. En estos dos factores el elemento común es la inclusión del concepto de *Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. **Directora. Dirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. ***Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. ****Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. Corresponding author: María del Carmen Lara Muñoz. Departmento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, B. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. 13 Sur 2702, Col. Volcanes, Puebla, Pue , Mexico. Phone: x 6064, Fax: , Recibido: 25 de abril de Aceptado: 8 de mayo de Salud Mental, Vol. 30, No. 5, septiembre-octubre 2007 discapacidad. La discapacidad se refiere al deterioro en el funcionamiento que se espera de un sujeto de cierta edad y sexo en un contexto social, y forma parte del costo social de la enfermedad. En el estudio de la Carga Global de la Enfermedad, la depresión se consideró como la enfermedad más discapacitante y ocupó el cuarto lugar en ese estudio. Otros cuatro trastornos psiquiátricos se incluyeron también entre las 10 enfermedades más discapacitantes. En 1985, en la versión revisada de la tercera edición del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, la Asociación Psiquiátrica Americana incluyó el deterioro en diferentes áreas de funcionamiento como criterio diagnóstico de los trastornos mentales. En 1992, la Organización Mundial de la Salud incluyó también el deterioro de la actividad entre las pautas diagnósticas de algunos trastornos mentales. Así, el objetivo principal de este trabajo es reportar la discapacidad producida por los trastornos afectivos y los trastornos de ansiedad identificados con mayor frecuencia en la Encuesta Nacional de Epidemiología Psiquiátrica a fin de compararla con la discapacidad producida por algunas enfermedades crónicas no psiquiátricas. Material y métodos Los datos analizados en este trabajo se recabaron durante la Encuesta Nacional de Epidemiología Psiquiátrica. Los diagnósticos se basan en el DSM-IV. La entrevista se realizó con una versión computarizada de la Entrevista Internacional Compuesta de Diagnóstico (CAPI, versión 15 certificada del CIDI). También se evaluó la prevalencia en los últimos 12 meses de las siguientes enfermedades crónicas no psiquiátricas: diabetes, artritis, hipertensión, cefalea, dolor de espalda y cuello, y otras enfermedades dolorosas. Todas éstas se identifican globalmente como enfermedades crónicas. En este trabajo se presenta la discapacidad producida por la depresión, manía, agorafobia sin pánico, fobia social, ansiedad generalizada, trastorno de pánico y estrés postraumático, y se compara con la discapacidad producida por las enfermedades crónicas. La discapacidad se evaluó con la Escala de Discapacidad de Sheehan y el número de días productivos perdidos. Esta escala es un instrumento de autorreporte que evalúa la discapacidad en diferentes áreas. Las subescalas se promedian y se obtiene así una puntuación total que va de 0, sin deterioro en el funcionamiento, hasta 10, que indica un funcionamiento totalmente deteriorado. También se preguntó a cada entrevistado sobre el número de días en que fue totalmente incapaz de trabajar debido a un trastorno presente en los últimos 12 meses. Se hicieron 5826 entrevistas completas y los resultados se sometieron a un complejo proceso de ponderación. Los datos que se reportan se basan en los pesos de la parte 2, que utiliza un total de 2362 entrevistas. Resultados De las cuatro áreas evaluadas, las de las relaciones con personas cercanas y la vida social fueron las más afectadas. Los trastornos que producen los niveles más elevados de discapacidad fueron la depresión (4.63 y 4.8), la fobia social (5.37 y 5.8) y el trastorno por estrés postraumático (5.61 y 5.35). La depresión tuvo el mayor impacto en el área laboral (4.88). En la puntuación total de la escala, los trastornos que produjeron mayor nivel de discapacidad fueron el estrés postraumático (5.35) y la depresión (4.72).La pregunta sobre cuántos días fueron totalmente incapaces de trabajar los entrevistados en el último año, reveló que la depresión y el trastorno de pánico fueron los trastornos por los que, en promedio, se perdieron mas días de actividad. Los días perdidos por enfermedades crónicas (6.89) fueron menos que los que se perdieron por depresión (25.51), agorafobia (18.56), ansiedad generalizada (9.5), trastorno de pánico (20) y trastorno por estrés postraumático (14.21). Discusión Los resultados más sobresalientes son los siguientes. En primer lugar, el efecto de los trastornos del estado de ánimo y de ansiedad es mayor que el efecto de algunas enfermedades crónicas no psiquiátricas. En las cuatro áreas de funcionamiento evaluadas, los trastornos psiquiátricos obtuvieron en promedio puntuaciones más elevadas que las enfermedades crónicas. En segundo lugar, debe destacarse el efecto discapacitante de un trastorno aparentemente poco grave como la fobia social. Si se considera que existen tratamientos efectivos, sobre todo para pánico y depresión, puede decirse que es posible disminuir el costo social de los trastornos del estado de ánimo y los trastornos de ansiedad. Este es el primer artículo en América Latina en que se reporta el impacto de los trastorno mentales según la discapacidad y los días de actividad perdidos que generan. Palabras clave: Costo social, discapacidad, días perdidos, depresión, trastornos mentales INTRODUCTION When the impact of illness is evaluated by indicators like mortality, mental illness has a less significant impact than other illnesses. As a result, the impact of mental disorders was underestimated until the last two decades of the previous century. This perception began to change as a result of two factors: on the one hand, the study of the Global Burden of Disease, reported by Murray and Lopez (1996), and, on the other hand, the definition of mental disorders by the American Psychiatric Association (1987). In the revised version of the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R), the American Psychiatric Association (1987) included the impairment of different areas of functioning as a diagnostic criteria for mental disorder. Later, the World Health Organization (1992) also included the deterioration of activity in the standard diagnoses of some mental disorders. The common element shared by these two factors is the inclusion of the concept of disability. Disability is the deterioration of the expected functioning of a subject of a particular age and sex in a social context. It forms part of the social cost of the illness. In the Global Burden of Disease study (Murray, 1996), mental disorders were identified as producers of disability. Depression was considered the major cause of disability and occupied the fourth place in the Global Burden of Disease, calculated as the sum of years lost due to premature death and the years lived with a disability (DALYS: Disability Adjusted Life Years). Projections for 2020 indicate that depression will occupy a second place, after coronary illnesses. Four other psychiatric disorders are included among the 10 most disabling illnesses: alcohol-related Salud Mental, Vol. 30, No. 5, septiembre-octubre disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. So far, population-based studies of the burden of mental disorders have been largely limited to Europe, North America and Australia. This report presents the first population-based estimates of the disability burden of specific mental disorders among a representative population sample from Mexico. The National Survey of Psychiatric Epidemiology includes specific indicators of disability associated with mental disorders: the Sheehan Disability Scale and the number of workdays lost. The main objective of this work is to assess the disability burden associated with specific affective and anxiety disorders identified in the National Survey of Psychiatric Epidemiology to compare results with the disability produced by some chronic non-psychiatric conditions. METHODOLOGY Sample Sample description and methodology have been previously published (Medina-Mora et al., 2003, 2005). The Mexican Psychiatric Survey is based on a stratified, multistage area, probabilistic sample of individuals aged years from the non-institutionalized population living in urban areas (population 2500) of Mexico. Approximately 75% of the Mexican population is urban, so defined. Personel from Berumen and Associates, an established survey firm in Mexico, conducted the field work, after being trained by licensed mental health professionals in the interview instrument. Data collection took place from September 2001 through May In all strata, the primary sampling units (PSU) were the 1995 census count areas (Area Geográfica Estadística Básica, or groups of them), similar to US census tracts, cartographically defined by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática in 1994 and updated during field work. Secondary sampling units were city blocks (or groups of them). Five city blocks were selected within each PSU with probability being proportional to measure of size. All household units within the selected city blocks were listed, and compact segments of approximately 10 households were formed from which one segment was selected with equal probability. Finally, one respondent was randomly selected from eligible members of each household. Eligible household members are all defined as Spanish-speaking persons who normally eat, sleep, prepare meals, and shelter themselves in the household and who are between the ages of 18 and 65 years. 6 The response rate was 76.6% of the eligible respondents (from a total of 5826 interviews, well above the original targeted sample size of 5000) and within the scope of other surveys from the World Mental Health Initiative ( % response rate range). The main reason for non-participation was being absent at the time (7.8% of the listed individuals). Direct refusals were also infrequent (6.2% of the listed individuals). All 5826 respondents answered a part 1 interview and a selected sub-sample of 2362 answered an additional number of questions on risk factors and supplemental mental disorders. The sample submitted to part 2 consisted of all respondents who screened positive for any disorder on part 1 plus a probability sub sample of other part 1 respondents. All interviews were conducted at each respondent s home after a careful description of the study goals was given and informed consent was obtained. No financial incentive was given for respondents participation. The Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Psychiatry approved all recruitment and consent procedures. Diagnostic assessment On this paper, we report on the 12-month prevalence for psychiatric disorders, defined according to DSM- IV criteria for diagnoses (Medina-Mora et al., 2005). The instrument used was the World Mental Health Survey Initiative version of the CIDI (WHO, 2001). This structured diagnostic interview was administered by an interviewer in face-to-face interviews using a laptop computer version (i.e. CAPI) and yielded DSM-IV diagnoses (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Adequate inter-rater reliability (Cottler et al., 1991; Wittchen et al., 1991), test-retest reliability (Wacker et al., 1990), and validity (Farmer et al., 1987; Janca et al., 1992) of earlier CIDI versions has been documented (for a review of studies which report the psychometric properties of the CIDI, see Andrews & Peters, 1998). These instruments have shown good performance in validity studies in Mexico (Caraveo et al., 1991, 1998) and other Spanish-speaking countries (Wittchen, 1994). The translation of the WMH-CIDI into Spanish was carried out according to WHO recommendations, utilizing material currently in use in Spanish (ICD-10, DSM-IV, and SF-36); this includes a back-translation of selected items and terms of the clinical sections. An international expert panel, comprised of mental health experts qualified as clinicians and researchers, solved the inconsistencies found in the back-translation. This same panel worked with an international harmonization group. The inconsistencies found in the back-translation were solved by consensus. The international expert panel produced a list of problematic terms for translation into Spanish and they agreed upon translation. Additional Salud Mental, Vol. 30, No. 5, septiembre-octubre 2007 minor adaptations to the Mexican context were made by consensus among the Mexican team. We also evaluated the prevalence through the last 12 months of certain non-psychiatric chronic conditions including: diabetes, arthritis, hypertension, headache, backache, other painful conditions, hay fever, stroke, heart attack, heart diseases, asthma, tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gastric ulcer, HIV or AIDS, epilepsy and cancer. All are identified as a whole as chronic conditions and this category is used to compare disability levels among individuals with chronic physical conditions to disability levels among individuals with mental disorders. In this work we present the disability produced by the following anxiety and depressive disorders: depression, mania, agoraphobia, social phobia, general anxiety, panic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Evaluation of disability There are different measurements of the impact produced by mental disorders. We present here the two indicators of disability evaluated according to the disorders presented in the last 12 months: Sheehan Disability Scale and the number of work days lost. The Sheehan scale was initially used in clinical studies of patients with panic disorder. The original scale (Sheehan, 1986) evaluates disability in three areas: 1. work, 2. social life and recreational activities, and 3. family life and home responsibilities. In this work the last sub-scale is divided into two parts: an evaluation of relationships with people close to the patient and an evaluation of home activities. The Sheehan scale is a graphic scale with verbal and numerical anchors. For example, when the subject met the criteria for a depressive episode during the last 12 months, he/she had to answer the question: Using a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 means no interference and 10 means very severe interference, what number describes how much your (sadness/discouragement or lack of interest) interfered with each of the following activities during the past 12 months?. The specific areas mentioned were: home (household management like cleaning, shopping, and taking care of the house/ apartment), ability to work, close relationships (ability to establish and maintain close relationships with other people) and social life. The scale of responses is a horizontal line with n
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks