RÉSUMÉ AND MAJOR THESES OF THE DISSERTATION THE DRAMATURGY OF THEATRICAL SPACE IN SHAKESPEARE S ROYAL TRAGEDIES Marcell Gellért The primary purpose of the dissertation is to reveal the anatomy of tragic

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 6
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.

Government & Politics

Publish on:

Views: 36 | Pages: 6

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

RÉSUMÉ AND MAJOR THESES OF THE DISSERTATION THE DRAMATURGY OF THEATRICAL SPACE IN SHAKESPEARE S ROYAL TRAGEDIES Marcell Gellért The primary purpose of the dissertation is to reveal the anatomy of tragic space through mapping up the spatial world of Shakespeare s royal tragedies Hamlet, King Lear and Macbeth via the comparative analysis of the three plays embedded in the context of the whole tragic oeuvre of the Bard. It pays equal regard to both the generic (genre-specific) and unique (play-specific) features of dramatic space, its dramaturgical roles and modes of operation, its various shapes, directions and dimensions. The dramaturgical significance of space and a directly space-specific approach to the world of the theatre, of drama, of tragedy, of Shakespearean tragedy and of the three distinguished radical tragedies in focal horizontal succession can be justified on various grounds within the conceptual framework of the dissertation. Along a deductive approach space gathers hermeneutical ground in the context of the genre s culturehistorical evolution both in case of the Greek (organic-pantheistic) and the Christian (conceptional-monotheistic) theatrical practice originally a ritual performance of cultic purposes and drama as its culturally articulated literary successor. The phenomenological and hermeneutical context of dramatic space is generated by all the dimensions that can be described in terms of a dialectical matrix dominant binary oppositions sacred-profane, mythicalhistorical, divine-human, fictitious-real, abstract-concrete, communal-individual etc. and played decisive roles in the evolution of the genre through gaining both cultic as well as cultural representation in the theatres of the successive eras. The physical and metaphysical aspects of dramatic space particularly those of tragic space their visible and hidden dimensions jointly ensure the spiritual continuity of the genre through the continuous secularizing process of its evolution in both cultures. To describe dramatic space in its multifunctional complexity is impossible for it is present in all the constituents of both the page and the stage versions of the plays due to its primary dramaturgical agency in the making of the plays worlds. In philosophical terms space is a basic still highly complex phenomenon whose definition demands the multiconceptual discourse of the allied forces of systematic thought: those of ontology (space as a domain of existence and the primary sphere of tragic being), phenomenology (space as an objective entity and its mental equivalent; space as an existential category), epistemology (the limits of cognition of space and the metaphysical dimensions of tragic space) and hermeneutics (ways and limits of interpreting real and fictitious, experiential and mental, direct and reflective spaces and tragic space as substance, medium and instrument of man s self-reflection and self-definition). A complex contextual discourse ensuring hermeneutical reliability would need the comparative analysis of the space-world, its nature, composition and dramaturgy of all the arts diachronically and/or synchronically related to drama a task, far transcending the limited scope of the present work, that can only be attempted through obvious analogies and tangible references. The theory of dramatic space can be verified only through the inductive analysis of plays as unique, complex and complete aesthetic entities that contain and embody a self-contained dramatic definition of reality - an approach that maps up their world and its constituents: its spheres, regions, locations, the nature, structure, agency and operation of tragic space both in its dramatic/textual and theatrical/performative aspects. The hermeneutical significance of dramatic space is ensured by thematic (conventional tragic topoi), structural (the compositional arrangement, relation and interaction of its constituents) and instrumental functions (the language of verbal communication and the performative language of the theatre as a complex medium). Tragedy as a dramatic definition of man and the conditio humana presents its subject as a victim of selfreflection cast in an excentric existential position without himself a creature of multiple dualities without an identity of his own that would verify and qualify his existence whose most vital issues belonging and alienation, community and isolation, identity and estrangement, sin and retribution, power and subjection etc. - create an organic topical network of spatial relations that appear in all the standard compositional elements of a play. The three royal tragedies of Shakespeare, Hamlet, King Lear and Macbeth are all set in worlds of extremes, of heightened physical, emotional and intellectual intensity i.e. liminal states stretched to the very limits of human experience the authentic setting for the dramatic metamorphoses that represent the all-pervading duality of man entrapped between two worlds in all the conflicting domains and contrasting dimensions of life (sacredprofane, mythical-historical, factual-fictional, individual-communal). The dissertation is divided into three major chapters of sequential arrangement mapping up the dramaturgical dimensions of theatrical space, tragic space and the spatial world of the three royal tragedies in gradually growing scale. I. The topography of theatre-space The introductory chapter surveys the cultic and cultural dimensions of theatre-space in the light of Hermes heritage: the fruitful match of hermetics and hermeneutics. Following the classification of the basic terminology of space and the related notions (place, region, location, scene etc.), in the context of philosophical space definitions, it reaches back to the genre s mythical roots, the Greek and medieval Christian traditions. The overview attempts to reveal the nature of Renaissance theatre-space, the relevant spatial aspects and dimensions of the Elizabethan public playhouses playing distinguished attention to the much debated, ever changing relationship of space and place, their analogous and contrasting features, correspondent, complementary and controversial aspects. II. The topography of tragic space Relying on the analogous features of the 10 tragedies, the chapter takes a comprehensive survey of Shakespeare s tragic space, its genre-specific compositional elements, its dominant dimensions and its complex dramaturgical agency. The topical centre of the analyses is the tragic individual himself around whom the unique world of each play is organized physically, emotionally and intellectually alike. The chapter is divided into three proportionate parts through the comparative analysis of the three major domains of tragic space with the body (the physical-sensual presence of the characters), the mind (the mental-psychological sphere of the protagonists being) and the language (as the verbal medium of communication with a distinct poetic i.e. aural and visual space-making role) in focus as chief agents of instrumental roles in creating the spatial world of a play. III. The topography of the royal tragedies The third part of the dissertation surveys the space-world of Macbeth, Hamlet and King Lear in three separate chapters focusing on the spatial composition as well as the unique dramaturgical features of the individual plays with an eye and ear on the analogies and correspondences that verify the substantial kinship of the plays. 1. THE MASTERPIECE OF CONFUSION : MACBETH The first in-depth analysis is organized around the concept of N. Frye s royal metaphor, its emblematic status and operative agency i.e. its central role through multiple nominal and topical (thematic and locative) signification in the world of Macbeth. The royal metaphor through multiple chronotopical embodiment is the topical centre of Shakespeare s darkest tragedy of the most condensed dramaturgical composition, spatial structure and spiritual gravity. In its instrumental quality it is the hermeneutical master key of the play that, through its physical, conceptual and verbal variants can open al the domains and dimensions of the Macbethworld. 2. INFINITY IN A NUTSHELL: HAMLET FROM WITHIN The analysis attempts at mapping up the spatial world of Hamlet drawn up from within the conceptual/intellectual framework of the play, rooted in the realm of the mind the sphere of Hamlet s globalized scepticism focusing on both the emblematic and idiosyncratic features of Hamlet-space. The play s unique position in the Shakespeare canon, its central place in Shakespace is among other factors partly due to the phenomenological as well as hermeneutical complexity of its spatial structure. Hamlet in this respect is the most controversial representative of the established Shakespearean practice of charging space and its constituents (place, location, scene) both in the physical, metaphorical and conceptual sense up with distinguished dramaturgical agency. The spatial design of the play takes shape and gain habitation through all the major compositional elements of tragedy in manifold local correspondences of plot, character, language, thought and scenery. In the world of all-pervading and undermining duplicities the double agency of tragic space is in full accord with all the other constituents of the tragic experience. It is the primary and primordial signifier and signified, agent and instrument of order, stability, constancy and continuity the repository of tradition as much as the most authentic and expressive instrument of voicing the characteristically interrogative mood and profoundly sceptical mind of the times, the age of its making. 3. ENDGAME : KING LEAR In Shakespeare s tragic universe undoubtedly Lear s kingdom is the most distant dominion. It is the frontier of the tragic experience, a strange, inscrutable and uninhabitable nowhere land lacking reliable spatial and temporal definition that provide proper setting to the other two related tragedies. This existential state of indefinition is an ideal setting to the sensual, emotional and mental extremities of the plot, the complex liminality of the tragic experience. At the same time it is the main source of the play s universalism which both topically and structurally transcends the established spatial limits of the conceptual framework of the genre. King Lear is not only the richest storehouse of the archetypal topoi of tragedy; in its spatial composition it also recalls the universalism of myths when raising the most vital existential issues of life in the complex, polyphonic language of the stage uniting the instrumental forces of theatrical presentation. Shakespeare s third radical tragedy is the anachronistic closure to the Bard s great tragic sequence, the grave endgame of his royal trilogy closing down the tragic cycle through corresponding culture-historical analogies recalling the classical pagan and the medieval Christian heritage in discordant concord. BIBLIOGRÁFIA Aiszkhülosz: Leláncolt Prométheusz. Ford. Trencsényi-Waldapfel Imre. in: Aiszkhülosz Drámák. Budapest, 1985, Európa. Aristoteles: Physica. ed. Ross, W.D., trans. H ardie, R.P. and Gaye, R.K. in: The Works of Aristotle. vol. 2. Oxford, 1953, Clarendon Press. Arisztotelész: Poétika. Ford. Sarkady János. Budapest, 1974, magyar Helikon. The Atomists Leucippus and Democritus: Fragments. A text and translation with a commentary by Taylor, C.C.W. Toronto, 1999, Univ. of Toronto Press. Bachelard, Gaston: The Poetics of Space. transl. Jolas, Maria. Boston, 1994, Beacon Press. Bahtyin, Mihail: A szó esztétikája. Ford. Könczöl Csaba, Kırösi József. Budapest, 1976, Gondolat. Bahtyin, Mihail: A szerzı és a hıs. Ford. Patkós Éva. Budapest, 2004, Gond-Cura Alapítvány. Berlin, Norman: The Secret Cause. Amherst, Univ. of Massachusetts Press. Bollnow, Oscar: Lived Space in: Readings in Existential Phenomenology. Bollnow, Oscar: Mensch und Raum. Stuttgart, 1963, W Kohlhammer. in: Schneller István: Az építészeti tér minıségi dimenziói. Brustein, Robert: A lázadás színháza.ford. Földényi F. László. Budapest, 1982, Európa. Buber, Martin: Én és Te. Ford. Bíró Dániel Budapest, 1994, Európa. Camus. Albert: Sziszüphosz mítosza. Ford. Ferch magda, Nagy Géza, Réz Pál, Szabolcs Katalin, Vargyas Zoltán, Vásárhelyi Júlia. Budapest, 1990, Magvetı. Clemen, W.H.: The Development of Shakespeare s Imagery. London, 1951, Methuen. Casey, Edward S.: Getting Back Into Place Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place- World. Bloomington-Indianapolis, Indiana Univ. Press. Derrida, Jacques: Esszé a névrıl. Ford. Boros János et al. Pécs, 2005, Jelenkor. Dollimore, Jonathan: Radical Tragedy. Brighton, Sussex, 1984, The Harvester Press. Eliade, Mircea: A szent és a profán. Ford. Berényi Gábor. Budapest, 1999, Európa. Eliot, T.S.: Káosz a rendben. Ford. Bódis Edit et al. Budapest, 1981, Gondolat. Faulkner, William: The Sound and the Fury. New York, 1979, Penguin Books. Frye, Northrop: Fools of Time. Toronto and Buffalo, 1967, Univ. of Toronto Press. Frye, Northrop: The Great Code. The Bible and Literature. New York, London, 1981, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Frye, Northrop: Kettıs Tükör. A Biblia és az irodalom. Ford. Pásztor Péter. Budapest, 1996, Európa. Füst Milán: Látomás és indulat a mővészetben. Budapest, 1963, Magvetı. Füst Milán: Összes versei. Budapest, 1972, Magvetı. Géher István: Shakespeare-olvasókönyv. Budapest, 1991, Cserépfalvi, Szépirodalmi. Géher István: Kutyavilág a Lear királyban. Magyar Shakespeare Bizottság, 1996, Elıadás. Géher István: A magyar Hamlet: Arany János furcsa álcája. Holmi, dec. Heidegger, Martin: Lét és idı. Ford. Angyalosi Gergely et al. Budapest, 1989, Gondolat. Heidegger, Martin:...Költıien lakozik az ember... Válogatott írások. Ford. Bacsó Béla et al. Budapest, Szeged, 1994, T-Twins Kiadó. Heidegger, Martin: A mővészet és a tér. Ford. Bacsó Béla. in....költıien lakozik az ember... Heilman, Robert: This Great Stage: Image and Structure in King Lear. London, 1942, Baton Rouge. Hölderlin, Friedrich: Csodás kékségben. ford, Szijj Ferenc. in: Heidegger, M.:...Költıien lakozik az ember... függelék: Husserl, Edmund: Cartesian Meditations. Cairns, D. trans. Tha Hague, 1960, Nijhoff. Jaspers, Karl: Tragedy is not Enough. Reiche, Herald A.T. transl. London, 1952, The Beacon Press. Keats, John: - - versei. Ford. Babits Mihály et al. Budapest, 1962, Magyar Helikon. Kerényi Károly: Hermész, a lélekvezetı. Ford. Tatár György. Budapest, 1984, Európa. Látszanak, mert Látszhatók Shakespeare a színház tükrében. Esszék, tanulmányok. Géher István, Tabi Katalin szerk. Budapest, 2007, ELTE. Levinas, Emmanuel: Teljesség és Végtelen. Ford. Tarnai László. Pécs, 1999, Jelenkor. Lichte, E.Fischer: A dráma története. Kiss Gabriella. Pécs, 2001, Jelenkor. Loszev, Alekszej: A mítosz dialektikája. Ford. Goretity József. Budapest, 2000, Európa. Mack, Maynard: The World of Hamlet. in: Brooks, Cleanth ed. Tragic Themes in Western Literature. New Haven, 1955, Yale Univ. Press. McElroy, Bernard: Shakespeare s Mature Tragedies. Princeton, New Jersey, 1973, Princetone Univ. Press. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: The Primacy of Perception and Its Philosophical Consequences. in: Lawrence, N. & O Connor, D., eds. Readings in Existentialist Phenomenology. New Jersey, 1967, Prentice-Hall Inc. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: Phenomenology of Perception. Smith, C. trans. New York, 1962, Humanities Press. Milton, John: Paradise Lost in: The Norton Anthology of English Literature. New York, London, 1962, W.W. Norton & Company. Nietzsche, Friedrich: A tragédia születése avagy Görögség és pesszimizmus. Ford. Kertész Imre. Budapest, 1986, Európa. Palmer, Richard E.: Hermeneuein-Hermeneia - Ókori szavak használatának mai jelentısége in: Fabiny Tibor szerk. Ikonológia és mőértelmezés. 3. köt.: A hermeneutika elmélete. Tanulmányok. Szeged, 1998, JATEPress. Pevsner. Nikolaus: Az európai építészet története. Ford. Borbás Mária. Budapest, 1974, Corvina. Pilinszki János: Végkifejlet. Budapest, 1974, Szépirodalmi. Platón: Timaiosz. Ford. Kövendi Dénes. in. -- Összes mővei. 2. köt. Budapest, 1984, Európa. Rabkin, Norman: Shakespeare and the Common Understanding. New York, 1967, Free Press. Readings in Existential Phenomenology. Lawrence, N, O Connor, D. eds. New Jersey, 1967, Prentice Hall. Reynolds, Bryan: Transversal Enterprises in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Chippenham and Eastbourne, 2006, Palgrave Macmillan. Rhem, Rush: The Play of Space Spatial Transformation in Greek Tragedy. Princetone, New Jersey, 2002, Princeton Univ. Press. Sambursky, Shmuel: The Concept of Place in Late Neoplatonism. Jerusalem, 1982, The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Schneller István: Az építészeti tér minıségi dimenziói. Budapest, 2005, Terc. Shakespeare, William: Complete Works. Proudfoot, R. ed., The Arden Shakespeare, London and New York, 1951, Methuen. -- Hamlet. Jenkins, H. ed. London, 1987, Methuen. -- King Lear. Muir, K. ed. London, 1994, Methuen. -- Macbeth. Muir, K. ed. London, 1989, Methuen. Shakespeare, William: Összes mővei. Ford. Arany János et al. Budapest, 1988, Európa. Sidney, S.Ph.: Defence of Poesie. in: Hollander, J., Kermode, F. eds. The Literature of Renaissance England. New York, 1978, Oxford Univ. Press. Spurgeon, Caroline: Shakespeare s Imagery and What It Tells Us. Cambridge, 1935, Cambridge Univ. Press. Szophoklész: Összes drámái. Ford. Babits Mihály et al. Budapest, 1950, Franklin. Tuan, Yi-Fu: Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis, 1977, Univ. of Minnesota. Whitehead, A.M.: Science and the Modern World. New York, 1953, Free Press.
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks