PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS. The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession Evren ÇELİK WILTSE - PDF

PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession Evren ÇELİK WILTSE Hegemony and Crisis in Global Political Economy: The Importance of Legitimacy

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 20
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.

Fan Fiction

Publish on:

Views: 13 | Pages: 20

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession Evren ÇELİK WILTSE Hegemony and Crisis in Global Political Economy: The Importance of Legitimacy Pınar İPEK Europe and its Changing Role in the International Political Economy Paul Simon ADAMS How Politics Dim the Lights on Turkey s Renewable Energy Future Okşan BAYÜLGEN Turkey and Latin America: A New Horizon for a Strategic Relationship Lic. Ariel GONZÁLEZ LEVAGGI Power Versus the Sovereign Equality of States: The Veto, the P-5 and United Nations Security Council Reforms Fakiha MAHMOOD Islam, Models and the Middle East: The New Balance of Power following the Arab Spring Burhanettin DURAN and Nuh YILMAZ Turkey s Conflict Resolution Efforts in the Middle East Talha KÖSE Freshwater Scarcity, Interdependence and Institutionalism in Jordanian Foreign Policy Imad H. EL-ANIS Book Reviews Winter 2013 Volume XVIII - Number 4 ISSN PERCEPTIONS Editor in Chief Mesut Özcan Deputy Editors Şaban Kardaş Murat Yeşiltaş Book Review Editor Şule Toktaş Managing Editor Engin Karaca International Advisory Board Bülent Aras Sabancı University Nuri Yurdusev Middle East Technical University Fuat Keyman Sabancı University John Hobson University of Sheffield Talip Küçükcan Marmara University Mustafa Kibaroğlu Okan University Burhanettin Duran Istanbul Şehir University Selçuk Çolakoğlu Yıldırım Beyazıt University Pınar Bilgin Bilkent University Oktay Tanrısever Middle East Technical University Ekrem Karakoç SUNY Binghamton Ferhat Pirinççi Uludağ University Tuncay Kardaş Sakarya University Homepage: The Center for Strategic Research (Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi- SAM) conducts research on Turkish foreign policy, regional studies and international relations, and makes scholarly and scientific assessments of relevant issues. It is a consultative body of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs providing strategic insights, independent data and analysis to decision makers in government. As a nonprofit organization, SAM is chartered by law and has been active since May SAM publishes Perceptions, an English language journal on foreign affairs. The content of the journal ranges from security and democracy to conflict resolutions, and international challenges and opportunities. Perceptions is a quarterly journal prepared by a large network of affiliated scholars. The views expressed in the articles are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Center for Strategic Research. PERCEPTIONS is a peer-reviewed journal and is included in the following databases and indexes: CSA Index, Current Contents of Periodicals on the Middle East, EBSCO, Index Islamicus, International Political Science Abstracts (IPSA), Lancaster Index to Defense & International Security Literature, PAIS Index, Pro Quest, Turkish Academic Network and Information Center (TÜBİTAK - ULAKBIM). To subscribe, write to the Center for Strategic Research, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi No: 8, Balgat / Ankara - TURKEY Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) Printed in Ankara by: AFŞAROĞLU MATBAASI ISSN PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Winter 2013 Volume XVIII Number TABLE OF CONTENTS Guest Editor: Evren ÇELİK WILTSE Editorial The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession Evren ÇELİK WILTSE Hegemony and Crisis in Global Political Economy: The Importance of Legitimacy Pınar İPEK The Quadruple Crisis of Europe: Europe and its Changing Role in the International Political Economy Paul Simon ADAMS Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: How Politics Dim the Lights on Turkey s Renewable Energy Future Okşan BAYÜLGEN Turkey and Latin America: A New Horizon for a Strategic Relationship Lic. Ariel GONZÁLEZ LEVAGGI Power Versus the Sovereign Equality of States: The Veto, the P-5 and United Nations Security Council Reforms Fakiha MAHMOOD Islam, Models and the Middle East: The New Balance of Power following the Arab Spring Burhanettin DURAN and Nuh YILMAZ Transformative Conflict Resolution in an Unstable Neighbourhood: Turkey s Conflict Resolution Efforts in the Middle East Talha KÖSE Freshwater Scarcity, Interdependence and Institutionalism in Jordanian Foreign Policy: Towards Conflict or Cooperation? Imad H. EL-ANIS Book Reviews PERCEPTIONS - Winter 2013 Editorial In the last few years, Perceptions has adopted a new strategy of regularly publishing special issues that have certain specific focuses. This move is in line with trends in the wider academic publishing community. Instead of publishing a medley of articles on random themes, editors are trying to cluster relevant articles under a shared umbrella in special issue formats. The purpose is generally twofold: to achieve a more comprehensive coverage and dialogue on a topic from various perspectives, and to provide a convenient source to researchers, who can now find a trove of information in a single special issue. Previous special issues of Perceptions have covered a diverse and compelling array of subjects. Some had a regional focus, such as the special issues on Asia- Pacific and the Balkans. Others have emphasised a single institution (NATO) or a methodological perspective (political psychology). All of these volumes were assembled by highly capable and competent guest editors. It is a great honour and privilege to be a member of this group, and I am deeply appreciative of this opportunity. Our readers will notice that the articles in this issue are clustered into two groups. Articles one to five are tied together by a similar methodological approach, international political economy (IPE); while the rest of the articles in this issue share a strategic and regional focus- the Middle East. Why an IPE issue of Perceptions? Economic power has become a critical instrument in the toolbox of nation-states, particularly since the Second World War. The bipolar order that split the world into two staunchly opposed camps was not fought solely on the political/military front. Equally important was the socio-economic front. Despite the proliferation of nuclear weapons, proxy wars and an unnerving arms race, this prolonged strategic confrontation came to an end without a single bullet shot directly between the two superpowers. Both on the left and right, analysts have pointed to the structural handicaps of a socio-economic system that paved the way to an implosion of the Eastern Bloc. The fact that the most important military/strategic confrontation of the 20 th century came to an end largely on economic and political grounds would speak volumes to the specialists of 1 international relations (IR) and foreign policy. We don t have to go as far as the famous proverb: It s the economy, stupid! Yet, completely disregarding the economy in foreign policy and global affairs would be to our detriment. IR scholars who prefer political economy as their primary methodological tool tend to spend significant time and ink on explaining the distinctiveness of this approach. Unlike economists, political economists do not treat economics as an autonomous sphere that operates according to its own laws and logic. The political economists tend to be more sensitive to the socio-political context that economy is embedded in. Eminent political economist Robert Gilpin, for example, draws attention to the power dynamics that emerge as a result of market transactions. By their very nature, markets are not neutral. They embody the values of society and reflect the interests of powerful actors. Needless to say, this power aspect of economic transactions is of fundamental concern to both political scientists and foreign policy specialists. The interests, values and norms of national political systems shape and to a large degree determine the economic activities. In fact, when it comes to global economy, Gilpin argues that although economic factors will play an important role in determining the characteristics of the global economy, the most important factors are and will be political. 1 However, deploying economic factors as the causal variable for all social phenomena would mean that we are committing the heresy of economic reductionism. Economic relations have never been the sole determinant of international political phenomena. On the other hand, it would be equally short-sighted, and just as reductionist, if we solely prioritised the military/ strategic variables at the expense of socioeconomic ones. Power is never exclusively a function of military might in the international system, nor does it automatically emerge from economic clout. Hence, the political economist needs to walk a fine line, and strike the right kind of balance between politics and economic variables for a sound analysis. But what would be the marginal contribution of a political economy approach to the study of international relations and foreign policy? Probably the greatest strength of any approach in a given discipline lies in its explanatory power. Thanks to the breakneck pace of globalisation in the last few decades, we have seen numerous anomalies that have blindsided conventional IR approaches. The implosion of the Soviet Empire, the rise (and possible decline?) of the EU, the tribulations of the US in the Middle East, the emergence of new mid-size powers in global platforms (i.e. BRICs) and numerous other puzzles are nearly impossible to untangle with 2 the reductionist approaches that solely prioritise strategic and political factors. The beauty of the political economy approach is that it is flexible enough to suit the paradigmatic leanings of a wide variety of analysts. You can be a (neo) realist believing that nations and national interests are the main driving forces in IR, and deploy the political economy approach very effectively, à la Robert Gilpin or Stephan Krasner. Alternatively, for neo-liberal institutionalists who have faith in international cooperation through institutions, political economy has much to offer, as the famous works of Joseph Nye or Robert Keohane illustrate. Or, you might prefer more empirical and quantitative approaches. Even then, you may operate under the political economy umbrella, just as Robert Axelrod or Helen Milner did. Finally, you might consider yourself a critical IR scholar. In this case, you can conduct most of your analysis with the help of IPE concepts and methodology, similar to the eminent figures in the IR discipline, such as late Susan Strange and Immanuel Wallerstein. The political economy articles in our selection come from various paradigmatic walks. While the G20 article by Evren Çelik Wiltse and the eurozone crisis article by Paul Adams straddle neo-liberal institutionalism and neo-realism, the articles by Pınar İpek and Oksan Bayülgen display more critical paradigmatic tones. In terms of their content, the first two articles have a more global/macro approach to recent developments. Evren Çelik Wiltse places the emergence of G20 in a larger historical and institutional perspective, comparing it to the Bretton Woods system. She highlights the recent shifts in the global economic power distribution, and the potential institutional implications of these shifts for global economic governance. Since Turkey is scheduled to host the G20 Summit in 2015, we hope this article will be timely and relevant for our readers. Next, Pinar İpek tackles the problem of structural imbalances in the global economy. While much ink has been spilled on the gravity of the 2008 crisis, very few have addressed the structural causes and subsequent political consequences of this turmoil. İpek s article sheds light on these complex dynamics. It would not be a misnomer to call 2013 the summer of unrest since the year was marked by numerous popular uprisings around the world. We hope İpek s analysis of capitalism s most recent turmoil and subsequent legitimacy crisis will resonate with our readers. The eurozone crisis is another topic that is over mentioned, yet under scrutinised. Most analysts and pundits reiterate the fact that this quagmire is a fiscal, political and economic crisis for the EU. Paul Adams adds an important forth and global dimension to the often stated list. He argues, rather convincingly, that 3 probably more important than the first three forms of crisis is that the eurozone paralysis is undermining the global stature of the EU by eroding its power projection capacity in the international arena. Our next two articles zoom in on the political economy of Turkey. It is a well-established fact that when it comes to trade balance, Turkey is having progressively larger trade deficits. This is mainly as a result of the hefty bill that is attached to our energy imports. Turkey is heavily dependent on oil and natural gas imports, yet there is hardly any trace of initiatives for promoting the development of sustainable energy sources. Based on extensive fieldwork, Okşan Bayülgen carefully identifies the massive political hurdles on the way to a sustainable and renewable energy future. The policy implications of this article are very significant, and we hope they will be acknowledged in policy-making circles. Ariel Gonzales hails from Argentina and his article carefully analyses the growing scale and scope of Turkey s relations with Latin America. In particular, Gonzales points to economic relations as the locomotive of rapprochement between Turkey and this seemingly distant region. While strategic and political dimensions do exist, as seen in the case of Turkish- Brazilian collaboration on Iran s nuclear issues, the economic dimension is probably the least controversial and most tangible aspect of bilateral relations with the region. Gonzales concludes with an optimistic note on the future prospects of Turkish-Latin American relations. The second cluster of articles in this issue has a more regional and strategic focus. Fakiha Mahmood looks at the structure of the UN Security Council. She tries to assess the prospects for diluting the veto powers of the permanent five (P-5), and achieving a more representative body. She argues that the issue is not just the P-5 unwillingness to devolve its exclusive powers. The lack of coordination and collaboration among the rest of the UN members constitutes a significant hurdle on the way to Security Council reform. Our next two articles place the Arab Spring at the centre of their analysis. Burhanettin Duran and Nuh Yılmaz state that rapidly changing power dynamics since the Arab Spring are drawing the region into a competitive arena. Important actors in the region (namely Saudi Arabia, Iran and Turkey) are leading this rivalry for alternative political models. However, the region is also walking on a tight rope between sectarianism and cooperation. The authors opt for a non-sectarian path that renders compromise and regional cooperation possible. The article by Talha Köse also addresses certain complications related to the Arab Spring. While Duran and Yılmaz tackle the issue from a domestic politics perspective (models for state-religion 4 affairs), Talha Köse offers us a peace studies/conflict resolution approach. His article analyses Turkey s recent mediation efforts in the Middle East, and makes the case that Turkey s concerns and normative priorities towards the region did not completely overlap with some of the significant actors. Hence, there emerged a growing gap between Turkey s conflict resolution discourse and the ongoing crisis in the region. Finally, the article by Imad El- Anis also looks at the conflict and cooperation dynamics in the region. However this time the focus is on scarce freshwater resources. The author argues that several factors are influential in determining whether countries will choose to compromise or not. Among them, El-Anis particularly highlights the severity of scarcity as a variable that at times compels countries to compromise, even when they may not have smooth, working relations in other spheres. The author also underlines the importance of interdependence and international institutions as factors that facilitate cooperation. It would be unfair to conclude this editorial without giving due respect to those who made this special issue possible. First and foremost, I would like to thank the extremely generous and capable staff of the Center for Strategic Research (SAM). Mesut Özcan and, especially, Engin Karaca have been incredibly supportive and patient with me throughout the whole process. I am deeply grateful for their understanding. Working with a government organisation will undoubtedly raise some eyebrows about the editorial autonomy and integrity. I can comfortably state that we completed this special issue with utmost intellectual and scholarly integrity. The only pressure SAM exerted upon us had to do with deadlines. Aside from occasional messages about turning in the articles on time, there was absolutely no interference in the subject matter or the content of the writings. Hence, it is the authors (and possibly the anonymous reviewers) who bear the responsibility of the content. We extend our appreciation to all of our authors, anonymous reviewers and the copy editor of this issue for their time and diligence. I also would like to thank Şaban Kardaş and Ziya Öniş for their unwavering support and encouragement. Without their help, I doubt it would have been possible for me to compile a special international political economy issue for Perceptions. As the guest editor, I hope this IPE issue of Perceptions is a thought-provoking volume and triggers further interest and engagement in political economy, both in academic and policy-making circles. Evren ÇELİK WILTSE Guest Editor 5 Endnote 1 Robert Gilpin, The Challenge of Global Capitalism, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, p.50. Italics belong to the author. 6 The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession 1 Abstract Thus far, the G20 represents the most significant collective attempt to address the 2008 economic crisis by the world s largest economies. It is the only global platform that could serve as an institutional panacea for the protracted economic slowdown that has been experienced since This article analyses the G20 by situating it in the general historical-institutional context of the global economic governance. It compares and contrasts the G20 with the Bretton Woods institutions. Subsequently, some of the most pronounced criticisms of G20 are addressed, including concerns about possible agenda creep and the lack of a hegemonic underwriter. Key Words G20, economic crisis, global governance, Bretton Woods, emerging economies, BRICs, Turkey, Mexico, political economy, development, Eurocrisis. Introduction Despite some harsh criticism, the G20 remains a relevant platform for global economic governance. The emerging * PhD, Assistant Professor of Political Science, South Dakota State University. Evren ÇELİK WILTSE * economies particularly benefit from the rotating annual summits and from the less hegemonic distribution of power. Moreover, the G20 generates certain tangible spill-over effects, particularly as it is also a venue for collaboration in diplomatic and non-economic matters. The progressively increasing involvement of global civil society in G20 summits, as well as the US-Russian rapprochement on Syria at the 2013 Russia Summit, demonstrates this capacity. Whether the G20 will be a short-term crisis management organisation or a longterm international governance structure that steers the world economy is still up to the members. Much ink has been spilled over how the 2008 crisis left the global economy in the lurch. Today, the G20 seems to be one of the rare collective attempts to pull the global economy out of its protracted recession. Despite its sophisticated institutional structure, the EU displays a colossal dysfunction in terms of finding a feasible solution to the eurozone crisis a
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks