Geruza P. Bella, Nádia B. B. Rodrigues, Paola J. Valenciano, Luciana M. A. E. Silva, Regina C. T. Souza. Abstract. Resumo - PDF

ISSN Rev Bras Fisioter, São Carlos, v. 16, n. 2, p , Mar./Apr Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia Original Article Correlation among the visual gait assessment scale, Edinburgh visual

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 7
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.


Publish on:

Views: 21 | Pages: 7

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

ISSN Rev Bras Fisioter, São Carlos, v. 16, n. 2, p , Mar./Apr Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia Original Article Correlation among the visual gait assessment scale, Edinburgh visual gait scale and observational gait scale in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy Correlação entre a Visual gait assessment scale, Edinburgh visual gait scale e escala observacional da marcha em crianças com paralisia cerebral diparética espástica Geruza P. Bella, Nádia B. B. Rodrigues, Paola J. Valenciano, Luciana M. A. E. Silva, Regina C. T. Souza Abstract Background: Gait disorders are very common in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (CP). In order to improve the CP children`s gait and to quantify the outcomes of this intervention it becomes essential to perform an instrumented analysis before and after the intervention. Objectives: To analyze the correlation among the Edinburgh Visual Gait Scale (EVGS), the Visual Gait Assessment Scale (VGAS) and the Observational Gait Scale (OGS). Methods: Cross sectional study aiming to analyze the gait of 8 children with spastic diplegia CP with level I or II in the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) through the EVGS, VGAS and OGS scales performed by 3 examiners. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Weighted Kappa scores were used to analyze the data considering a significance level of 5%. Results: The intra-rater analyses showed a moderate to excellent agreement (k=0.41, 1.00) among the methods of the children s classification, being the comparison between VGAS and the EVGS scales presented the highest level of agreement, while the OGS scale presented a considerable disagreement in comparison with other scales. The inter-rater agreement showed to be predominantly high. Conclusions: The results provide evidence that the VGAS and the EVGS scales are more suitable for children s spastic diplegia CP gait assessment when compared to OGS. Keywords: physical therapy; gait; cerebral palsy; diplegia. Resumo Contextualização: Desordens da marcha são comuns em crianças com paralisia cerebral (PC) diparética espástica. Com o intuito de aprimorar a marcha dessas crianças e quantificar os desfechos de tal intervenção, torna-se necessário que se faça uma análise instrumentada pré e pós-intervenção. Objetivos: Correlacionar a Edinburgh Visual Gait Scale (EVGS), a Visual Gait Assessment Scale (VGAS) e a Escala Observacional de Marcha (EOM). Métodos: Estudo transversal de análise da marcha por meio das escalas EVGS, VGAS e EOM, envolvendo oito crianças com PC diparética espástica, nível I ou II do Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), avaliadas por três examinadores. O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP. Os dados foram analisados pelo índice Kappa ponderado, considerando um nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: O estudo intra-avaliadores mostrou que a concordância entre os métodos na classificação dos sujeitos foi de moderada a excelente (k=0,41, 1,00), sendo a comparação entre a VGAS e a EVGS a de maior índice de concordância, enquanto a EOM obteve grande discordância em comparação com as outras escalas. A concordância interavaliadores se mostrou predominantemente alta. Conclusão: Os resultados fornecem evidências de que a VGAS e a EVGS são mais adequados para avaliação da marcha de crianças com PC diparética quando comparadas à EOM. Palavras-chave: fisioterapia; marcha; paralisia cerebral; diplegia. Received: 07/01/2011 Revised: 10/27/2011 Accepted: 12/01/2011 School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil Correspondence to: Geruza Perlato Bella, Serviço de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional HC UNICAMP, Ambulatório de Fisioterapia Aplicada à Neurologia Infantil, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, s/nº - Dist. Barão Geraldo, CEP , Campinas, SP, Brasil, 134 Correlation among gait scales in diplegic children Introduction Gait disorders are common outcomes in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (CP) 1-4. These disorders tend to become worse with age limiting the functionality of this population, being the gait one of the major focus of the rehabilitation of these children. In order to improve the gait of these children and to analyze the effects of the proposed interventions it becomes necessary to perform an instrumented analysis of the gait before and after the intervention 1,5,6. The kinetic, kinematic and electromyographic quantitative analysis is considered by the literature the gold standard of the gait assessment, since it generates an accurate and reliable information on the three planes of motion 1,7-10. Despite of the presented benefits, the authors 1,7-10 consider their applicability in clinical practice limited, since this type of analysis requires expensive and sophisticated equipment reducing its availability in most of the rehabilitation centers, especially in emerging countries. The observational gait analysis is more feasible in the clinical settings, since it has a low cost and does not require sophisticated equipment or locations It is important to point out that despite of its feasibility this type of analysis is still relatively subjective, which may lead to a low validity, reliability, sensibility and specificity when compared with the kinematic analysis in laboratories 7. In order to standardize, systematize and quantify the observational gait analysis in children with CP increasing its validity and reliability, scales have been developed and have been constantly revised and modified 11, One of the main scales used for this purpose is the Physicians Rating Scale (PRS) 17. There are several modified versions of this scale including the Visual Gait Assessment Scale (VGAS) developed by Dickens and Smith 11. Such version was developed with the aim to evaluate, in the sagittal plane, the position of hip, knee, ankle and foot. To date, this version has been validated only for use in children with spastic hemiplegia CP, and it has not been validated for Portuguese language. Read et al. 14 developed a new scale for observational gait analysis, the Edinburgh Visual Gait Scale (EVGS), which is composed by 17 parameters for each lower limb evaluated in six anatomical sites: trunk, pelvis, hip, knee, ankle and foot. The parameters are evaluated in each gait phase and analyzed in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes through the observation of videotapes. The EVGS scale differs from the VGAS for being more extensive and detailed and for analyzing items in other planes of motion as described previously by identifying gait deviations expected in children with CP. Nunes 18 validated the EVGS for Portuguese language, developing a software that contains a training package for its application. Recently, Araújo, Kirkwood and Figueiredo 15 developed a gait scale called Observational Gait Scale (OGS). It is a Brazilian- Portuguese scale composed by 24 items that evaluate ankle/ foot, knee, hip and pelvis in the frontal and sagittal planes of motion. Researchers have been creating and validating observational scales that are more reliable with the aim to assist physical therapists in the clinical decision making, in the evaluation of their interventions and also to unify the language of these professionals 10,11,15,17,19,20. The observational gait scales do not present good results for all evaluated parameters, however they remain important clinical tools. Based on the similarities and differences between them and the fact that are no studies of which one would be more appropriate for children s population with spastic diplegia CP in the literature, it becomes necessary to compare these scales in order to assist physical therapists in choosing the scale to be used in clinical practice in this specific population. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to compare the EVGS, VGAS and OGS in order to verify whether there is an agreement among the final scores of the scales with regards to the degree of deviation from normal gait; to analyze the inter-rater reliability in relation to the total score of the scales and to analyze the time and the difficulty degree of use of each scale. Methods Participants A cross-sectional study involving children with diagnosis of spastic diplegia CP was carried out. These children were able to walk without equipment or human help (level I or II of the Gross Motor Function Classification System-GMFCS) 21, were within the age group corresponding to the age of gait acquisition up to 18 years old and were able to understand simple verbal commands. Children with moderate to severe cognitive delay, with ataxia or athetosis, or who had undergone surgical procedures or application of neurochemical blockades in the last six months were excluded from the study. The selected sample included all children in weekly attendance in the Outpatient Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Department of the Hospital das Clinicas (HC) of the Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil, who fulfilled the established criteria for inclusion in this study and whose legal guardian after receiving explanations on the research were willing to participate and signed the informed consent form. The study was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of UNICAMP, number 419/ Geruza P. Bella, Nádia B. B. Rodrigues, Paola J. Valenciano, Luciana M. A. E. Silva, Regina C. T. Souza 136 Materials and procedures The researchers were trained to use the EVGS through the training package developed by researchers from the UNICAMP and provided by Nunes 18. The researchers were also trained to use the VGAS and OGS scales through the explanation of the importance of each item to be analyzed and also about its score according to the possible deviations. This training was performed by three researchers simultaneously. The data collection was carried out at the Outpatient Pediatric Neurological Physical Therapy Department of the HC of the UNICAMP. It consisted of an evaluation aiming to describe the sample, colleting data such as age, gender and level of motor impairment through the GMFCS classification (level I or II) and also consisted of video recordings of the participants gait in a standardized room avoiding visual and/or audio interferences. For the video recording collection, a digital Sony camera, model Handycam DCR-HC96, was positioned in marks previously determined by the researchers in order to standardize all recordings. The participants were instructed to walk a distance of 4 meters (m) for at least four times (i.e. 16 m in total), with barefoot, using swimsuits, in a comfortable speed and going forward and backward the route without stopping until they were instructed to stop. After video recording the frontal plane the experiment was paused for positioning the camera to capture the sagittal plane, restarting the test as soon as possible. This procedure was carried out by the three examiners together. Data analysis The three scales were applied through the observation of the collected videos, independently by the three examiners, through the software Windows Media Player 12.0, using resources such as freeze frame and slow motion. Individually, each examiner timed the total time spent, answered positively or negatively about the ease of understanding and application, and made personal and descriptive notes with regards to the positive and negative characteristics of the three scales separately. The video analysis was carried out in two days, being half of the sample in each day. All children were evaluated taking into account the right and left lower limbs separately, firstly by the VGAS scale followed by the EVGS and OGS scales, obligatorily in this order, to ensure greater reliability in determining the time taken for application of each scale. Among the application of each scale an intervals of 15 minutes were given in order to avoid interference from physical and mental fatigue. In the application of the EVGS, the examiners did not perform the measurement of the angles directly from the video using only visual estimation in the attempt to approximate as close as possible from daily practice 1. The examiners were physical therapists with considerable experience in evaluating children with CP. To perform the inter-rater reliability and the correlation tests among the scales, the items involving the hip, knee and ankle of the three scales and the item pelvis of the EVGS and OGS scales were used, since VGAS does not evaluate this item. Data related to the trunk were used only to verify the inter-rater reliability and was not possible to compare them with the other scales, since only EVGS analyzes this item. In order to be possible to correlate the quantitative data among the three scales, it was necessary to assign scores for each item of the OGS as follows: normal=0, moderate deviation=1 and severe deviation=2. In order to be possible to compare the scales used in this study, the scores were standardized into four categories according to the degree of deviation from normality, which are: normal, mild, moderate and severe. For the VGAS a score equal to 24 was classified as normal; score ranging from 18 to 23, as mild deviation; score ranging from 17 to 12, as moderate deviation and scores lower or equal to 11 was classified as severe deviation. In the EVGS, the score equal to 0 was classified as normal; score ranging from 1 to 11, as mild; score ranging from 12 to 23, as moderate and score higher or equal to 24 was classified as severe. For the OGS, score equal to 0 was classified as normal; score ranging from 1 to 16, as mild; score ranging from 17 to 32, as moderate and score higher or equal to 33 was classified as severe. Statistical analysis was performed using the weighted Kappa index, with the estimates classified according to Landis and Koch 22, which has established the degree of agreement between two methods or examiners. The level of agreement between all methods - or examiners - was observed pairing up method and examiner. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses and calculations were performed using the SAS statistical package 23. Results Eight children, four female and four male, with a mean age of 10.5 (SD=3.8), characterized the sample. Regarding the severity of the motor impairment, six children were classified as level I, and two children as level II of GMFCS. Analyses among the evaluated scales (Intra-raters analysis) Table 1 presents the weighted Kappa index frequencies for each combination of scales; being the majority of these Correlation among gait scales in diplegic children statistics tests (approximately two thirds) were classified as moderate to excellent (k=0.41, 1.00). By evaluating Tables 1 and 2 together, the three cases of poor agreement occur when OGS is compared with the other two scales. In contrast, the highest level of agreement occurred in the comparison between VGAS and EVGS. It is also possible to observe, in Table 1, the agreement levels for the classification of the individual in the different assessment scales for each examiner, regardless of the side. For the first examiner, most of the agreement levels among the evaluation methods were considered moderate. However, the occurrence of the poor agreement level and the worst weighted Kappa value obtained (0.11) deserve some attention. This index was obtained through the comparison between EVGS and OGS scales. The second examiner showed a higher agreement in classifying the subjects. The highest levels were obtained from the comparisons between VGAS and OGS and also between EVGS and OGS. For the third examiner,it was observed the weakest comparison between EVGS and OGS, in other words, the evaluation methods disagree strongly in relation to the status of subjects. In contrast, the agreement statistics among the VGAS with the evaluation methods EVGS and OGS resulted in excellent level of agreement. Inter-raters analysis According to Table 3, about two-thirds of the statistics analyses varied between moderate to excellent, and the values ranged from 0.14 to 1.00 (Table 4), being approximately one third of the agreement statistics classified as excellent. By analyzing Tables 3 and 4 together, the cases of poor agreement levels were observed in the combination of examiner 1with the others examiners, emphasizing that this fact also occurred with the OGS. Table 3 shows that there are high agreement indexes among the examiners with the VGAS and EVGS scales. The statistics for the EVGS ranges between moderate and excellent, presenting different values only for each hemi-body (Table 4). The OGS presents the lowest indexes of inter-rater agreement. These indexes may be considered statistically null, as shown by the weighted Kappa test. Table 1. Weighted Kappa index for all combination of correlation of the evaluated scales and examiners. General agreement Occurrences Agreement levels Occurrences Examiner 1 Examiner 2 Examiner 3 0 Poor Weak Fair Moderate Substantial Almost perfect Interpretation: Landis and Koch 22. Table 2. Weighted Kappa index for the correlation of all scales. Examiner 1 Examiner 2 Examiner 3 Right Left Right Left Right Left VGAS X EVGS * VGAS X OGS * 0.81 EVGS X OGS 0.11* * 0.27* *Non-significant; results significant at p 0.05. Table 3. Weighted Kappa index frequencies to all examiners correlation and of VGAS, EVGS and OGS scales. General Agreement Occurrences Agreement levels Occurrences VGAS EVGS OGS 0 Poor Weak Fair Moderate Substantial Almost perfect Geruza P. Bella, Nádia B. B. Rodrigues, Paola J. Valenciano, Luciana M. A. E. Silva, Regina C. T. Souza Table 4. Weighted Kappa index to all examiners correlation. VGAS EVGS OGS Right Left Right Left Right Left Examiner 1 X * 0.27* Examiner 1 X * 0.14* Examiner 2 X * * 0.56 *Non-significant; results significant at p 0.05. Application duration and subjective analysis The three examiners recorded the application duration of each scale in all children, being the application duration mean of 7 minutes for the VGAS, 12 minutes for EVGS and 14 minutes for OGS. The subjective analysis with regards to the difficulties in applying each scale, all three examiners agreed that the VGAS was the easier scale to understand and to apply. The examiner also considered the EVGS of easy understanding, however of difficult application and the OGS of difficult understanding and application. With regards to the comments made at each scale, the VGAS and the OGS received no positive comments, while the EVGS was considered the most complete. The three examiners considered the VGAS confusing regarding the score on each item as in most of the items the scale attributes the higher score to normal and in other two items ( knee peak extension in terminal stance and timing of heel rise ) the abnormalities are scored with the higher value compared to normal, which confuses the categorization as normal, mild, moderate and severe. In addition, with regards to the VGAS the examiners 1 and 2 declared the absence of pelvis and trunk analysis as negative, since these segments usually present deviations from normality in individuals belonging to the studied population. All examiners declared that the score sheet of the EVGS is not practical as it does not have separate scores for each hemibody, in addition, its items are arranged in a confused way with regards to the planes of motion that each item is evaluated. Moreover, the examiners 2 and 3 declared difficulties in estimating the angles visually and they also stated that the gait analysis through visual angular estimation might not be a reliable measure. All examiners declared that the figures of the OGS ended up making the analysis more difficult compared to when the gait phase was indicated in wri
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks