CLA eradication in an extensively managed Scottish hill flock. K. Voigt, G. Baird, F. Munro, F. Murray & F. Brülisauer - PDF

CLA eradication in an extensively managed Scottish hill flock K. Voigt, G. Baird, F. Munro, F. Murray & F. Brülisauer Caseous Lymphadenitis (CLA) Caused by the bacterium Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 52
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.

Entertainment & Humor

Publish on:

Views: 22 | Pages: 52

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

CLA eradication in an extensively managed Scottish hill flock K. Voigt, G. Baird, F. Munro, F. Murray & F. Brülisauer Caseous Lymphadenitis (CLA) Caused by the bacterium Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Leads to the formation of lymph node-associated abscesses External or internal abscesses Chronic cases associated with ill thrift / weight loss ( thin ewe syndrome ) History of CLA in the UK First cases confirmed in two dairy goats in January 1990 (Lloyd et al. 1990) Animals had contact with 20 imported Boer goats from West Germany (imported in 1987) Tracings of movements of imported goats revealed another five infected premises June 1991: first cases in sheep Further tracings revealed seven infected sheep flocks without any contact to imported animals No further action taken, movement restrictions lifted History of CLA in the UK Disease often stated as particular problem in terminal sire breeds Particularly prevalent in rams (up to 60% of adult males in some flocks = husbandry / particular management systems) More recently CLA also diagnosed in hill / upland breeds (NCC, Blackface) History of CLA in the UK Recorded outbreaks of CLA in GB sheep flocks from 1991 to 2008 (VIDA data) History of CLA in the UK 2000: Survey in terminal sire breeds (rams and Health scheme members only, Baird et al. 2000) 2538 samples from 745 flocks Dutch ELISA (Dercksen et al. 2000), sensitivity 79% (+/- 5), specificity 99% (+/- 1) 224 samples positive 9,93% 18% of flocks positive (36% of which with 1 positive animal) History of CLA in the UK Seen as a disease of rams Lesions mainly at head and neck, farmers initially see no major economic impact Terminal sire breeds (meat breeds) Bred in small to medium-sized pedigree flocks Attending shows and sales Fighting amongst ram groups may have facilitated spread History of CLA in the UK Only recently cases recognized in females Cases in hill and upland flocks Internal lesions No survey data available on numbers of affected commercial flocks Anecdotal data suggests continuous spread within the UK sheep population History of CLA in the UK So far very rare, but probably still to come: Economic impact Losses at meat inspection and in wool production Study in UK abbatoirs: 0.004% of carcasses Losses to Australian meat industry estimated million A$ per annum (Paton et al 2003) Losses to Australian wool industry estimated 17 million A$ per annum (Paton et al 1994) Economic impact Inability to market sheep with CLA lesions Epidemiology / sources of infection Disease usually bought-in with subclinically infected animals Direct contact with infected animals at shows / sales / from neighbouring flocks Abscesses contain large numbers of bacteria Epidemiology / sources of infection Aerosol transmission organism can penetrate intact skin or infect wounds / scratches Epidemiology / sources of infection Yarding, housing, gathering, close confinement Epidemiology / sources of infection Shearing Epidemiology / sources of infection Dipping C. pseudotuberculosis can survive in sheep dip for up to 24 hours As little as 25 bacteria / ml of dip solution can cause infection Epidemiology / sources of infection Indirect transmission (troughs, handling equipment, tagging / worming equipment) C. pseudotuberculosis can survive in the environment for up to several months Case report Scottish hill flock Case history Initial complaint Unusually high number of female stock with lymph node associated abscesses in June 2007 (parotid, mandibular, prescapular, pre-femoral) Flock details Approx. 750 predominantly Scottish Blackface ewes Production of mule lambs for sale as breeding stock, purebred Blackface as replacements Small number of mules kept on farm, crossed with terminal sire breeds (Suffolk, Charolais, Texel) Case history Flock details Main income from sale of high-quality mule lambs and gimmers for breeding Case history risk factors Flock details Closed female flock, only rams introduced Female replacements away-wintered on other lowland farms (no direct contact to other sheep) Health Scheme member (EAE) Rough hill grazing, some grassland Case history risk factors Only twin-bearing ewes housed for short period at lambing time No contract shearers Ewes routinely dipped in autumn, lambs dipped in summer for tick control Case history History of CLA in the flock 2003: CLA diagnosed in two bought-in rams (Texel & Charolais) Abscesses lanced and flushed - lesions healed Affected rams retained for breeding One ram later developed multiple CLA lesions and was eventually culled Four further cases in ram group (including Blackface) 2005: One abscess in female investigated - A. lignieresii Case history History of CLA in the flock From 2005: repeated serological testing of ram group, CLA positive rams culled 2006: no further clinical cases in ram group, all rams repeatedly sero-negative Spring/summer 2007: high number of females with lymph node associated abscesses Initial investigation Initial investigation June 2007 CLA diagnosed in 12 out of 25 animals sampled (culture and / or serology) Estimated prevalence of lumps in female stock approx. 5% Another 30 ewes with suspicious lesions discovered at shearing (July 2007) Initial investigation Further investigation autumn 2007 Flock seroprevalence (ELITEST CLA (Hyphen Biomed, France)) 1010 sheep blood sampled in Nov 2007 Clinical inspection for swellings / abscesses Swabs taken if possible First flock test (n = 1010) Bacteriology: Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolated from 8 / 15 abscesses sampled Other isolates: A. pyogenes (1), Actinomyces hyovaginalis (1), Actinobacillus lignieresii (3), Bibersteinia trehalosi (1), sterile (1) First flock test (n = 1010) Clinical inspection: 87 sheep with a history of lumps (8.6%) parotid, sub-mandibular, pre-scapular and pre-femoral sites Overall seroprevalence (n=1010): 10% Ram group (n=23): 0% Ewe lambs (n=228): 1.8% Cull ewes (n=206): 27.3% Remaining flock (n=554): 7.4% 144 ewes culled on suspicion of CLA (14.25%) (clinical and / or serological) First flock test (n = 1010) Immediate action All animals with a history of abscesses culled All sero-positive animals culled Stop dipping (use of pour-on and injectable products) Good hygiene at shearing Cleaning and disinfection measures for equipment and handling areas Control options Problem: Sale of breeding stock of otherwise high health status Change in farm policy (production of lambs for slaughter)? Vaccination? Live with the disease? Eradication? Previous eradication efforts elsewhere Successful eradication from goat herds in the Netherlands (Dercksen et al. 1996) Successful eradication from two Dutch sheep flocks (Schreuder et al. 1994) Successful eradication from small sheep flocks in the UK (Baird et al. 2010) Successful eradication by motherless rearing of lambs in Norway (Nord et al. 1998) and Germany (author s observations) Eradication trial Quarterly blood sampling plus clinical inspection of the whole flock Bacteriological examination of any available abscess material Serological testing of blood samples (ELITEST CLA, Hyphen Biomed, France) Commercially availabe ELISA test kit Based on recombinant PLD antigen Eradication trial Change in ectoparasite control (although dipping of ewe lambs continued for tick control), good hygiene at shearing Separate management of seropositive animals and their offspring eventually culled Separate management of clinically suspicious animals (with lumps ) Clinical inspection and blood sampling scheduled with other management tasks (scanning / after lambing / clipping / pre-tupping) Ewe lambs tested from 6 months of age Buy replacement rams early, keep in isolation and test twice for CLA Results - clinical No confirmed clinical cases since July 2008 (i.e. no external lymph node abscesses confirmed as CLA by bacteriology) Still occasional sheep with abscesses, but all pus samples negative for CLA (other pathogens) Results - serology CLA seroprevalence (ELISA) % Test sensitivity 87% (i.e. 13% false-negatives ) Test specificity 98-99% (i.e. 1-2% false-positives ) Results - serology % CLA seroprevalence (ELISA plus Western Blot) Results post mortems Aug / Sept 09 % CLA seroprevalence (ELISA plus Western Blot) n=5 n=2 Results - post mortems Aug 09 5 animals submitted for post mortem tested positive in May 2009 all ELISA-positive, 2 WB positive, 3 WB inconclusive (very weak band) All clinically healthy, no palpable lymph node swelling Full post mortem, lymph node cultures (external and internal body and visceral lymph nodes) 4 animals: no CLA infection identified 1 animal: tiny purulent lesion in pre-scap. LN, culture positive! Results - post mortems Sept 09 1 animal submitted for post mortem (2 tested positive in August 2009) both low ELISA-positive, WB positive clinically healthy, no palpable lymph node swelling Other animal sold for slaughter submitted animal: no CLA infection identified Results post mortems Aug / Sept 09 % CLA seroprevalence (ELISA plus Western Blot) last external abscess subclinical infection identified by post mortem Results ongoing bacteriology Serological testing stopped after August 2009 (lack of funding) Continuing clinical inspections after August 2009 All external abscesses sampled and submitted for bacteriology 26 swabs submitted between and All CLA negative Results interpretation?? Results serological side-effects Offspring of infected ewes: 30 lambs kept with infected mothers on separate field between June and November 2007 Ewes culled in Nov 2007 Lambs managed as separate group All lambs sero-negative in Nov 07 One develops CLA lesion in January 08 = culled All others repeatedly sero-negative (at least 2 further tests 3 months apart) Results - serological side-effects Serology versus clinical inspection (cull ewes, n=205) History of lumps (n=83) No history of lumps (n=122) Serology negative: n = 43 Serology negative: n = 105 Serology positive: n = 40 Serology positive: n = 17 Results - serological side-effects Repeated testing of CLA-positive animals (n=11) initial test in June 07, follow-up in November 07 All animals sero-positive in June 07 plus history of LN-associated abscesses, confirmed by culture in five 4 / 12 animals sero-negative in November! CLA lesions healed / hardly recognizable in 11 / 12 Results - post mortem (5 cull ewes) All five culture and ELISA positive in June 07, post mortem carried out in November 07 1 ewe sero-positive but no lesions found, CLA not isolated from pm material 1 ewe sero-negative and no external lesions, but CLA abscess in pulmonary lymph node 1 ewe open abscess on previous site but sero-negative 1 ewe slightly enlarged but not abscessed LN on previous site, seronegative 1 ewe thin, slightly enlarged but not abscessed LN on previous site, multiple pulmonary and mediastinal CLA lesions, sero-positive Results - post mortem (5 cull ewes) Discussion Problems Sensitivity / specificity of the blood test Internal lesions subclinical infection Biosecurity under extensive management conditions and at wintering Resistance of C. pseudotbc in the environment Dipping of lambs risk factor farmer compliance Conclusions Eradication requires dual approach Fluctuating antibody levels Sero-negative / culture positive animals Elisa useful tool BUT expensive and difficult in large flocks under extensive management conditions Danger of re-introduction (neighbouring flocks / rams) Acknowledgements Hyphen Biomed for the generous supply of ELISA test kits Gordon Harkiss & Neil Watt (MV Diagnostics) George Gunn (SAC Epidemiology Unit) Catherine Clark (SAC Inverness) Clinic for Ruminants, University of Munich SAC receives funding by the Scottish government Thank you for your attention!
Related Search
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks